According to this news item the definition of rape has been widened. If a woman refuses sex in the middle of the act, the rest of the act is considered rape. I guess she can re-accept sex making it consensual again. Don’t be surprised if you see criminal cases with the following description:
“She went to his place at 8:00PM. They had coffee. They had sex from 8:30PM to 8:54PM. He raped her from 8:55PM to 9:01PM. Then she reluctantly agreed to sex. So, technically, he partially raped her from 9:02PM to 9:15PM. They both had dinner. Later they had sex after he briefly raped her.”
Jeez….the law gives ppl so much scope to play with it…..sometimes, the loopholes are so blaring that you tend to think of the magnitude of chaos that these laws will have on a nation with more than a billion ppl.
LOL… Ur observation is funny1 Still, I think thats exactly how the law should be!
that guy must be an expert at KS poses and doses
It sounds ridiculous when you put it that way… I guess the lawmakers keep going aboard when they try to safeguard women’s rights…. What is the correct measure of rights you can bestow on her so that she is safe, and still limited enough so that she doesn’t abuse her power?
Not an easy question to crack.. Until further revisions to the act, I think we’ll have to support it.
Would you please lend me your creative brains for a couple of days! This article just cracked me up!!
Annathe I do think the law is right in this case. Why shouldn’t a woman have the right to change her mind?
ROFL!
@WA
Yeah Right!
No doubt a woman should have the right to change her mind in the middle of sex. But saying that she has the right to sue him for not stopping as soon she changes her mind, is totally ridiculus!
Next time just try jumping from the 20th floor and then changing your mind to commit suicide right at the 10th floor! Lets see you sue god for screwing up your life!